I've banned robin, removed her post that I shouldn't have let through anyway, and blocked all replies.
Objection forces King to rephrase
Objection overruled. "This would not have occurred, but for mental illness"
Brauchler asking Woodcock to compare his report to the others
13 pages and 8 pages for his two reports. 1st one was the one with the sanity opinion
Brauchler says "irresistible impulse" was removed from Colorado law. Objection to that lack of foundation overruled. Woodcock says he wasn't aware. Brauchler points out it was while Reagan was president
"All of the information is relevant in our consideration. All of it has to be very carefully considered. Not all of it tells us if he was delusional"
"theres a difference between legal knowledge and the knowledge of the societal norm"
"You keep talking about the clinical application...there is none... there is the forensic application of the law"
Objection argumentative. overruled
"he asked the question. the witness is not answering the question. the question is a direct, leading question"