Hey all. I just did something amazing. I turned my volume all the way down and imagined Brauchler was talking for a few minutes. Feel completely rejuvenated!
The only defense the defense has is stall, stall, stall. Drag out the trial before JH has to pay for what he did. All the Drs tend to support the PT more than the DT.
Mr. King is wearing a vest which unfortunately doesn't do a thing to improve his credibility. I'm no fan of King mainly because at the most emotional testimonies or viewing of victims, he would always be reading. All of the other DT watched with rapt attention. It impressed me.
I'm beginning to understand why this trial might take until Labor Day if the DT keeps bringing in witnesses who insert "uh" and "uh, uh" after every other word in their answers.
I have been watching everyday. I am not convinced 100% that JH was sane at the time of the shooting and therefore there is reasonable doubt. I have not concluded that he was or was not sane.
Does the fact that a doctor declared JH insane introduce sufficient reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case that JH was sane? I guess what I am asking is, do the jurors have to be 100% certain that JH was sane, in order to find him guilty?