The use of the name "Jimmy" is what folkd called him when they knew him. Many of my family members call me by my given name, although I haven't gone by that name in 50 years.

I think the jury has no questions because there is really nothing to ask. This is for the most part all in the past.

Did or did not JH tell the doctors that he had thoughts of kill people for years?

Something tells me defense will do mom's testimony after lunch, and finish the day w/her direct examination...So that jury goes home thinking about the emotion she shows, & some empathy is potentially elicited... I don't think there will be any cross exam on JH's mom today. DT wants the jury thinking about it all night...maybe that's what's happening with these extraneous witnesses. 'Timing so DT can end the day on JH's mother's testimony...that would probably be wisest approach, in my opinion.

Lori so has the Prosecution they are banking on impact statements....which i hope include "how nice of the holmes to show the jury and the remind the victims how their child or the parents will not be able to go to Disney, bear mountain, fishing, boating, play piano, go to college, go trick or treating....it was re victimization and low of the defense and frankly if I were a juror I would be offended

I agree w/those noting there are no jury questions for these witnesses. Especially father. I think that's telling.

@sophiamtn - i agree.

@ Phil, can you have your drone do a flyover and show us how packed the parking lot is?

Aren't the defense attorneys all public defenders? (After the convictions, I had a local friend say that the defense attys should hide their faces - Seems to me if these are public defenders, they are simply doing the best they can with what they have.) Am I correct in this? (This thought came to me after seeing @Me 's comment)

@ Tami- All public defenders from various offices.

@Clancy yeah, my cousins given name is James, we have always called him Jimmy. He's now 45 and we still call him Jimmy, lol

@phil - my husband works with unmanned aircraft. You could offer him a job - we'd gladly move to Colorado! ;o)

Dan Edwards was not impressive last night legally - but was a bit fun to see Ms Nelson get apoplectic at his proposals!

Do death row inmates get visitation? If so, its thru glass right?

@Sophia- she was apocalyptic because Edwards was so incredibly wrong.

IMO -- not sure anything the DT could present in mitigation that would outweigh the aggravating factors

Whomever is commenting that videotaped jury testimony is dropping the ball on prosecution's behalf: Prosecution objected to most of it. These witnesses had scheduling issues, & the judge was nice enough not to subpoena them and interfere with their schedules. Prosecution pointed out that jury could not ask questions, etc. but judge overruled it- being mitigation phase. I still think that DT is blowing it with these taped testimonials, unless they're buying time to end with mother for the day.

To regress and resort to displaying this grown failure of a man as "Jimmy" is ridiculous! the mitigation they stated from day 1 was "his mind spiraled and broke and he had severe mental illness that finally detached from reality. yet they are putting on mitigation to feel sorry for a little boy and a family who knew nothing about his mental disease and "jimmy's" world. unless they bridge this to the day he snapped it will prove futile!