Theater shooting trial day 38: Dr. Woodcock to return to the stand, jail video likely to be shown
Dr. Jonathan Woodcock, the defense's expert, is going to return to the stand for the remainder of his cross-examination Friday. James Holmes' attorneys are also likely to screen for the jury another jail video showing the gunman in November of 2012, around the time that they say his mental health condition became aggravated in the jail.
I wonder how much money the defense paid for this guy compared to Dr. Reid who did way more work
by bob6/26/2015 4:11:26 PM
How can you diagnose anyone when you haven't even read all the medical records? Total Quack in my opinion.
by Abrandt6/26/2015 4:11:27 PM
@Robin, yes he certainly is awesome!
by Liz6/26/2015 4:11:28 PM
wow this Dr. is hurting the defense. He sampled the video Really. Brauchler you are killing it
by Sheri Reining6/26/2015 4:11:29 PM
@Lovewins what is wrong with cheering for lawyers????
by Joey6/26/2015 4:11:30 PM
@okx--I completely agree that interpretations of body language (e.g., swivel, swivel, swivel) are subjective. I don't recall that making observations and drawing subjective inferences from them are forbidden activities on this blog.
by flip6/26/2015 4:11:31 PM
brauchler is CLEARLY just more seasoned than king. actually, the PT as a whole seems to be.. even edson lol.
by blue6/26/2015 4:11:31 PM
The feedback is coming from Mr. King. PLEASE STOP!! PLEASE STOP AC!!!
by JG6/26/2015 4:11:33 PM
In my experience the way the PT is questioning the witness is normal!
by LG6/26/2015 4:11:33 PM
Woodcock rambles and he keeps getting caught in LIES!!
by Sheri Reining6/26/2015 4:11:34 PM
He sure does not remember alot
by Sheri Reining6/26/2015 4:11:35 PM
can we be done with this guy now lol
by Tara6/26/2015 4:11:36 PM
Why such a lynch mob mentality toward Mr King and Dr Woodcock? I think some of us are forgetting who's on trial here.
by kate6/26/2015 4:11:37 PM
27 questions worded differently to get this guy to say yes or no. Only the 157th time ive been annoyed during this trial.
by tiffany6/26/2015 4:11:40 PM
I know more about JH's sanity than this guy
by peace19786/26/2015 4:11:41 PM
@ Mark. I have watched a few. This one is somewhat pathetic on both sides for very different reasons. Mean, slick pro against Tired pro. This is about is sentiments of eye for eye killing, not insanity, for the most part. No advancement for a society filled with illness.
by okx6/26/2015 4:11:44 PM
@Phil- do you know what King's winning rate is of cases he's been the DT for?
by Victoria6/26/2015 4:23:03 PM
AC has made his point that this dr is incompetent. It's getting painful to watch this dr get humiliated
by RH6/26/2015 4:23:04 PM
Haha, of course they go on break right when I get my audio to work!
by Annie6/26/2015 4:23:06 PM
phil reminds me so much of billy eisner.
by blue6/26/2015 4:23:07 PM
@Joey It was a joke because everyone knows lawyers are the scum of the earth...ALL lawyers. lol
by #LoveWins6/26/2015 4:23:18 PM
look its phil! lol i didnt even realize thats the same guy that chats in here until now ... wow
by Tara6/26/2015 4:23:19 PM
@okx, since my tax dollars are paying for both the PT, and DT, I'm happy the killers case is weak, and we have a DA with the spine to expose their extremely poor witness. At least some of our money is being well spent.
by Mark6/26/2015 4:23:21 PM
Oh @kate..... can't we have a little fun here???
by JG6/26/2015 4:23:22 PM
I'm wondering if Woodcock's hesitancy to give an answer to that question may mean he perjured himself.
by Tammy Garrison6/26/2015 4:23:23 PM
This dr. is good, but mobs never listen.
by okx6/26/2015 4:23:24 PM
Thank you Flip! And @ Sheri....he doesn't seem to remember much, does he??
by TammyC6/26/2015 4:23:25 PM
Again, can you go over what the 3 phases of sentencing are they are talking about?
by Tammy Garrison6/26/2015 4:23:26 PM
@Kate, nobody has forgotten who's on trial and people are just stating their opinions.
by Liz6/26/2015 4:23:27 PM
@news7 is it normal for defense to be discussing sentencing phase after 1st day they are presenting their case?
by Goliath_Fish6/26/2015 4:23:32 PM
I don't think Woodcock is a bad Doc, some Doc's don't make good witnesses. Just like many prosecutors switch sides and become defense attorneys. Some court hearings are like ping-pong and some like boxing matches...
by Resa6/26/2015 4:23:33 PM
@okx what is your issue with lawyers?
by Joey6/26/2015 4:23:34 PM
@ok In the US we have an adversarial legal system, just how it is. As for killing due to illness, we put down rabid dogs even though rabies is not their fault.
by Abrandt6/26/2015 4:23:37 PM
Or is the whole trial the 3 phases?
by Tammy Garrison6/26/2015 4:23:37 PM
Hey channel 7 you may want to put a disclaimer that the views expressed in this live blog and conversation do not reflect the views of your station or related interests. Thanks
by ts6/26/2015 4:23:45 PM
didn't Reid testify that JH's illness would be exacerbated by being in jail and not being treated?
by mandi6/26/2015 4:23:47 PM
Thanks for your questions!
by Phil Tenser6/26/2015 4:24:00 PM
Thanks @Phil. Doing a great job.
by JG6/26/2015 4:24:54 PM
Issues with lawyers? The good, the bad, the ugly. They are all there.
by okx6/26/2015 4:27:58 PM
Is there another Suzanne on here? I thought I heard Phil say a question from Suzanne. I'm working and listening and chatting a little. Great job as always @ Phil and Channel 7!
by Suzanne6/26/2015 4:30:00 PM
Given how defense has handled their case so far, I'm wondering is there legitimate concern here for a possible mistrial?
by puglife6/26/2015 4:33:22 PM
I think AC has the jury now, with this Doc. I don't know if there is anything King can do on re-direct.
by Resa6/26/2015 4:33:25 PM
He's making me feel uncomfortable and I'm not the witness. Note to self: if ever on the witness stand being crossed examined by GB, just roll into a ball, rock back and forth and go to your happy place. :\
by FMM6/26/2015 4:34:07 PM
I should not have approved many of the recent comments. I'm removing them now and blocking any continued conversation on those antagonistic topics.